The New York appeals court has rejected the plea to overturn a gag order placed on former President Donald Trump throughout the duration of his financial fraud case. This order, implemented in October, specifically prohibits Trump and his legal representatives from making any comments about the court staff presided over by Judge Arthur Engoron. The need for such a directive arose after Trump falsely referred to one of Engoron’s clerks as the “girlfriend” of Senator Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.).
The New York Supreme Court, functioning as a trial court rather than the state’s highest court, upheld Engoron’s gag order, asserting that it did not unlawfully curtail Trump’s freedom of speech. In the court’s opinion, it was stated that the potential harm from the order is minimal since it is narrowly focused, solely preventing statements regarding the court’s staff.
Judge Engoron emphasized the adverse impact of Trump’s comments on his staff, stating that they have been “inundated” with threats. Subsequently, the judge extended the order to encompass Trump’s legal team, prompted by their scrutiny of his communication methods with the court staff.
In the official order, Engoron clarified that his law clerks are public servants executing their duties as per his instructions, which include providing legal expertise and opinions. He highlighted that defenders, including Trump’s attorneys, are not entitled to confidential communications between him and his court staff. The court’s decision to maintain the gag order underscores the perceived necessity of preserving a focused and respectful legal environment during the proceedings.