As President-elect Donald Trump prepares to take office, his foreign policy approach will likely feature his signature blend of aggressive rhetoric and personal diplomacy with world leaders, particularly those who are seen as adversaries of the United States. With rising concerns about the growing alliances between China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea, Trump aims to fracture these relationships and diminish the influence of these nations on the global stage.
Trump’s approach to international relations has often been marked by a willingness to engage with leaders like Russian President Vladimir Putin, Chinese President Xi Jinping, and North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un, while also openly criticizing the European Union and NATO allies. Trump has made it clear that his goal is to disrupt the partnerships between these adversarial nations, calling their coalition an “impossible” development that undermines American interests. In his own words, he described the alignment between Russia, China, Iran, and North Korea as “stupid” and expressed confidence that these leaders have reasons to cooperate with the United States if they wish to avoid isolation.
These nations, grouped by some analysts as the “axis of aggressors” or “CRINK” (China, Russia, Iran, North Korea), may not always share common goals, but they are united in their opposition to U.S. dominance and their desire to challenge American leadership. The war in Ukraine has only strengthened their ties, with Putin turning to Beijing, Tehran, and Pyongyang for support in his invasion of Ukraine. As a result, experts worry that these nations’ unity, despite their differences, represents a significant challenge to American influence and stability.
Some foreign policy experts argue that helping Ukraine repel Russian aggression is the best way to undermine the growing strength of the CRINK coalition. They believe that a Ukrainian victory would send a strong message to the authoritarian powers that threaten global peace and security. However, Trump has been hesitant to fully commit to this goal. While he has stated that Europe should take on a larger role in supporting Ukraine, some of his closest allies, like Tucker Carlson and Elon Musk, have voiced opposition to further U.S. involvement in the conflict.
In contrast to President Biden’s strategy of rallying international allies to isolate Russia, Trump’s administration may take a more independent stance, focusing on direct negotiations with Russia and other adversaries. While Trump’s unpredictability is seen by some as a strength, it remains unclear whether this approach will be effective in breaking the growing alliances between China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea. Critics, including former National Security Adviser Robert O’Brien, argue that Trump’s focus on bilateral diplomacy, without the backing of key European and Asian allies, may put the United States at a strategic disadvantage.
With the specter of nuclear weapons looming, particularly with the growing nuclear ambitions of North Korea and Iran, Trump’s foreign policy will need to balance deterrence and diplomacy. The looming expiration of the New START treaty between the U.S. and Russia in 2026, coupled with the rapid advancements in nuclear capabilities by China, Iran, and North Korea, makes this a critical issue. The Trump administration may face difficult choices in managing these threats, particularly as some Republican lawmakers and think tanks push for a more aggressive stance on nuclear weapons production and testing.
Ultimately, Trump’s foreign policy decisions will be shaped by the changing dynamics of global power. His ability to navigate the complex relationships between these rogue regimes while balancing American interests, alliances, and security will determine whether his approach can succeed in reshaping the global order in favor of the United States.