On Friday, the U.S. Supreme Court chose not to promptly address the claim made by former President Donald Trump asserting immunity from prosecution in connection to his efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election. This decision permits a lower court to continue its examination of the matter. U.S. Special Counsel Jack Smith had made an extraordinary plea for the Supreme Court to expedite a final ruling on Trump’s assertion of criminal immunity, bypassing a lower appeals court. Nevertheless, the Supreme Court justices declined to fast-track the process.
Trump, a prominent candidate for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination, is facing allegations from prosecutors accusing him of attempting to obstruct Congress and defraud the U.S. government in his endeavors to overturn President Joe Biden’s 2020 election victory. Trump argues that the case should be dismissed, citing the immunity of former presidents from criminal charges related to their official duties.
Following U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan’s rejection of Trump’s immunity claim on December 1, Trump appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, resulting in the suspension of his trial scheduled for March. Special Counsel Jack Smith sought an expedited Supreme Court ruling on December 11, aiming to prevent further delays in the trial.
Trump’s legal team opposed Smith’s request, characterizing it as an imprudent attempt to hasten a decision on the issues. Notably, three of the nine Supreme Court justices were appointed by Trump, solidifying a 6-3 conservative majority on the bench. If Trump were to secure re-election, there is speculation that he might consider pardoning himself from any federal charges.