Minnesota Governor Tim Walz is facing mounting criticism from Republican circles for remarks perceived as overly accommodating toward China. During a 2016 interview, Walz, a former Democratic vice presidential nominee, expressed skepticism about framing China solely as an adversary. His comments have sparked concerns among conservatives, who argue that his views suggest a dangerous leniency towards the Chinese Communist Party.
Walz’s connection to China dates back to 1989 when he taught English and American history in Guangdong through a teach abroad program. His subsequent career trajectory led him to Congress and eventually to the governorship of Minnesota. Notably, in 1994, he combined a personal trip to China with his honeymoon, scheduling the trip to mark the fifth anniversary of the Tiananmen Square massacre—a fact highlighted by critics who question his stance on human rights issues.
In the 2016 Agri-Pulse Communications interview, Walz emphasized the potential for a cooperative relationship between the U.S. and China, provided China adhered to international norms on human rights and environmental issues. He remarked, “I’ve been to China about 30 times. … I don’t think China necessarily needs to be an adversary. While we must be firm on issues like the South China Sea, there are many areas where we can collaborate.”
His frequent visits and deep familiarity with China, including organizing educational trips, have fueled accusations from the right. Former acting Director of National Intelligence Richard Grenell has criticized Walz as being excessively favorable to China, calling him “Marxist Walz” and suggesting his views align too closely with Beijing’s interests. James Hutton, a former assistant secretary at the Department of Veterans Affairs, labeled Walz’s perspective as dangerously naïve regarding China’s authoritarian regime.
Republican Senator Tom Cotton has demanded an explanation for Walz’s long-standing engagement with China, describing it as a potential liability. “Tim Walz owes the American people an explanation about his unusual, 35-year relationship with Communist China,” Cotton asserted.
Defenders of Walz, including Harris campaign spokesperson James Singer, argue that these criticisms are unfounded. “Governor Walz has consistently stood up to the CCP, championed human rights, and prioritized American jobs and manufacturing,” Singer stated, countering claims that Walz is soft on China.
Further bolstering Walz’s stance, some observers, such as Washington Post columnist Josh Rogin, point to his history of criticizing Beijing’s policies on Tibet and Xinjiang and his efforts to address human rights concerns.
The debate continues, with divided opinions even among Chinese social media users. Some view Walz favorably, while others are skeptical of his intentions based on his past statements and affiliations.