House Judiciary Committee Chair, Representative Jim Jordan from Ohio, has raised concerns and hinted at potential contempt proceedings against Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, a Democrat from Georgia. This move comes following a subpoena requesting information regarding the utilization of federal funds within her jurisdiction.
While Willis’s office has partially complied with the subpoena by providing some requested documents in response to the February subpoena, Representative Jordan expressed dissatisfaction, highlighting that certain crucial documents related to allegations raised by a terminated employee remain outstanding. These allegations pertain to the misuse of federal grant money by a former employee, which was flagged by another employee before being terminated.
The core issue revolves around suspicions that a former Willis campaign aide, now employed within the county, intended to utilize federal grants for purposes beyond the intended scope of a youth violence and gang prevention program. Notably, it remains unclear whether the federal funds were ultimately spent inappropriately.
Recordings of conversations between Willis and the whistleblower indicate that the district attorney did not contest the impropriety of using grant money for items like laptops and promotional merchandise. However, Willis staunchly denies any wrongdoing, attributing the accusations to baseless litigation initiated by a terminated employee from a prior administration.
In a statement issued in February when the subpoena was initially raised, Willis maintained her innocence, stating that the allegations lacked substance and were dismissed by previous court rulings. She emphasized the efficacy and legality of her office’s grant programs, conducted in collaboration with the Department of Justice and in accordance with their guidelines.
Representative Jordan’s recent letter underscores his continued interest in obtaining documents related to the whistleblower’s claims, particularly focusing on any correspondence between Willis’s office and the relevant Justice Department divisions overseeing grant funding. Jordan has highlighted the gravity of the allegations concerning the potential misuse of federal grant funds, indicating the Committee’s responsibility to investigate them thoroughly.
As per Jordan’s communication, Willis’s office has provided a partial response, furnishing “15 award letters from the Department of Justice’s Office of Justice Programs and Office of Violence Against Women,” alongside approximately “27 screenshots of Expense Budget Summaries.” However, this remains insufficient to address the Committee’s concerns adequately.