In recent years, Texas has become a frontline defender in securing the southern border of the United States. Over 100 miles of razor wire have been strategically placed at key crossing points to deter illegal immigration, part of the state’s larger multi-billion-dollar border security initiative, Operation Lone Star. With Texas controlling more than 60 percent of the U.S.-Mexico border, the state has invested over $10 million in these border barriers, which have been critical in reducing illegal crossings.
This week, Texas scored a major legal victory when a federal appeals court ruled in favor of the state’s right to continue placing concertina wire along the border. This ruling came after federal Border Patrol agents under President Biden cut down sections of wire in September 2023, undermining Texas’ efforts to maintain security. GOP Gov. Greg Abbott, a staunch conservative, was quick to condemn the federal interference, saying, “Biden needs to be thanking us, not blocking our attempts to protect the border.” Abbott criticized the Biden administration for its failure to fulfill its constitutional duty to protect U.S. borders, stating that Texas had to step up in the federal government’s absence.
But the question remains: Does razor wire effectively prevent illegal crossings, and is it worth the investment? Experts like Andrew Arthur, a policy analyst at the Center for Immigration Studies, believe the answer is clear. Data from U.S. Customs and Border Protection shows a dramatic drop in illegal encounters in Texas following the installation of razor wire. The state’s deployment of concertina wire began in May 2023, following the expiration of the Title 42 pandemic-era restrictions, and has had a measurable impact on reducing migrant crossings.
According to Arthur, the wire has not only deterred migrants but also shifted the flow of illegal crossings westward, making it more difficult for smugglers to transport people. This, he explains, adds hundreds of miles to the smuggling routes, which could discourage illegal activity. While razor wire isn’t a permanent solution, it has proven to be an effective short-term deterrent in the absence of a comprehensive federal border security strategy.
However, the use of razor wire is not without its challenges. Unlike a permanent wall, concertina wire requires ongoing maintenance and regular monitoring to ensure its effectiveness. Border patrol officers stationed in remote areas face the burden of long shifts, and with Texas’ vast geography, sustaining such efforts can become a logistical and financial challenge. Still, the state has been relentless in its commitment to border security.
On the humanitarian front, opponents of the wire argue that it leads to increased injuries and fatalities among migrants. Dylan Corbett, who heads the Hope Border Institute in El Paso, claims that the wire forces migrants into more dangerous areas, contributing to a rise in deaths from desert exposure or drowning in the Rio Grande. He argues that the federal government must take charge of the situation, stating that uncoordinated state actions are only escalating the crisis.
While these concerns are important, supporters of the razor wire contend that it is a necessary tool to discourage dangerous crossings. It helps mitigate the risks of migrants attempting to cross in unsafe conditions. The wire’s deterrent effect may very well save lives by preventing migrants from entering dangerous areas in the first place.
Ultimately, the debate over Texas’ use of razor wire underscores the broader issue of border security. With the Biden administration failing to take meaningful action to secure the border, states like Texas are stepping in to fill the gap. The question is no longer whether the wire works; it’s whether the federal government will finally step up and work with states to address the immigration crisis head-on. Until then, Texas will continue its efforts to defend its borders and protect its citizens.