Supreme Court Drops Bombshell On Jack Smith

In a landmark decision by the Supreme Court regarding former President Trump’s immunity, one justice raised concerns over the constitutionality of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s appointment, leading to significant implications for the prosecution. The ruling, issued by a 6-3 majority on Monday, affirmed a president’s substantial immunity for official acts while in office. The case was remanded to lower courts to determine which specific acts fell under this immunity.

“The President is not exempt from the law. However, Congress lacks the authority to criminalize the President’s actions in carrying out Executive Branch duties under the Constitution. The Framers designed a system of separated powers that necessitates a vigorous, independent Executive,” stated the opinion.

Justice Clarence Thomas, in a separate concurring opinion, underscored concerns regarding Jack Smith’s appointment as special counsel, questioning its adherence to constitutional structure. Thomas emphasized, “The immunity of the President from prosecution for official acts is a constitutional mandate. Preserving the integrity of the Executive Office secures liberty, as does the separation of powers which dictates how offices are created and filled.”

Thomas articulated his doubts, pointing out that the appointment of a special counsel by the Attorney General may have bypassed lawful establishment, essential under constitutional provisions. “If the office of the Special Counsel lacks statutory foundation, any prosecution by such an officer cannot proceed,” Thomas asserted, highlighting that the principle of appointing federal officers solely through congressional legislation serves as a critical check against executive overreach.

The case stemmed from allegations by Jack Smith of federal election interference against Trump, implicating him in various charges related to the Capitol riot and electoral misconduct. Trump denied all accusations, arguing for immunity from prosecution for acts conducted as president.

In an amicus brief, Ed Meese, former Attorney General under President Reagan, contended that Smith’s appointment was unconstitutional, likening it to an unauthorized assertion of authority. Meese argued vehemently against Smith’s representation of the United States in court, challenging the legality of his appointment without explicit statutory backing.

Thomas echoed these concerns, highlighting the absence of clear statutory authority for the Special Counsel’s position and the potential violation of the Appointments Clause. He emphasized the necessity of determining whether Smith’s role constituted that of an inferior or principal officer, a distinction pivotal under constitutional appointment procedures.

In conclusion, the Supreme Court’s decision not only reinforced presidential immunity for official acts but also sparked a rigorous examination of the constitutional framework governing appointments and prosecutorial authority. The implications extend beyond the specific case of Trump, shaping the future landscape of executive accountability and separation of powers in American governance.

  • Trump Makes Dirt Great Again?

    Sen. Roger Marshall Leads Pro-Health, Pro-Farmer Movement That Starts Beneath Our Feet While the left pushes artificial lab-grown food and government mandates, one Republican lawmaker has a different idea: save the soil, save America. Senator Roger Marshall (R-Kansas), a longtime ally of President Donald Trump, is championing a powerful new approach to fixing America’s health…

    Read More

  • Trump Trolls His Biggest Hater

    President Donald Trump is celebrating big news from the entertainment world — and it’s hitting the liberal media where it hurts. CBS announced it’s pulling the plug on The Late Show with Stephen Colbert, the anti-Trump late-night program that’s dominated the 11:35 p.m. time slot since 2015. But according to Trump, this cancellation is long…

    Read More

  • Mexico Takes Legal Action Against Trump?

    A new international showdown is brewing—this time, south of the border. Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum has sparked outrage by threatening legal action in U.S. courts over President Donald Trump’s aggressive immigration enforcement policies. The move comes after a Mexican national living in the U.S. illegally died during an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) operation in…

    Read More

  • Joe Rogan Attacks Trump AG

    Conservative outrage is boiling over after podcasting giant Joe Rogan called out former Trump Attorney General Pam Bondi over the Department of Justice’s controversial handling of the Jeffrey Epstein investigation. On his hit show The Joe Rogan Experience, Rogan didn’t hold back. He questioned Bondi’s credibility after the DOJ quietly released a two-page memo concluding…

    Read More

  • Speaker Johnson For President?

    House Speaker Mike Johnson isn’t eyeing the White House — but conservatives are paying close attention anyway. Despite his rapid rise to power and growing influence in the Republican Party, Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) made it clear this week: he has no plans to run for president. Speaking with New York Post columnist Miranda Devine…

    Read More

  • Trump Tells Bondi To Release The Secrets

    President Trump is putting pressure on the DOJ to come clean — and America is watching. In a bold statement outside the White House on Tuesday, President Donald Trump said Attorney General Pam Bondi has his full support to release “anything credible” related to the FBI’s files on Jeffrey Epstein. “If it’s credible, I say…

    Read More